Work with quality evaluation

On this page you can find instructions, tips and templates for evaluation and annual follow-up at the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy.

Please note that all the documents one the page are in Swedish.
 

• Advice on planning and conducting 
• Tips from pilot round evaluations at Uppsala University
• Guidelines for the Programme Review Model UFV 2021/2434

• Cheat sheet for evaluations spaces in Medarbetarportalen

• Template for planned actions
• Template for development projects

The documentation must be submitted at different times of the year depending on whether the program is evaluated in calendar years (for example 2020) or academic years (for example 2020/2021).

The officer responsible for each program being evaluated ensures that the documentation is submitted and creates a case for decision in the following committees.

Programmes that are evaluated during a calendar year

1. Proposals on the plan, examiners and student representatives are submitted to GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, which recommend (December).
2. The proposals are first sent to AU, which prepare, and then to ON to take decisions (January).
3. The statements, reports and planned actions are sent to GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (November).
4. GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and recommend (November).
5. The statements, reports and planned actions are first sent to AU, which prepare, and then to ON (December).
6. ON take decisions on necessary measures or follow-ups and approve (December).
   The statements, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the registrar (January).
7. The statements and planned measures are published on the Uppsala University website (January).

Programmes that are evaluated during an academic year

1. Proposals on the plan, examiners and student representatives are submitted to GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, which recommend (May).
2. The proposals are first sent to AU, which prepare, and then to ON to take decisions (June).
3. The statements, reports and planned actions are sent to GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (May).
4. GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and recommend (May).
5. The statements, reports and planned actions are first sent to AU, which prepare, and then to ON (June).
6. ON take decisions on necessary measures or follow-ups and approve (June).
7. The statements, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the registrar (August).
8. The statements and planned measures are published on the Uppsala University website (August).